Thursday, May 9, 2019
Mary Wollstonecrafts A Vindication of the Rights of Woman Essay
Mary Wollstonecrafts A Vindication of the Rights of cleaning lady - Essay ExampleGrounding the idea of womanish rights, Wollstonecraft bases herself upon positions of the gravid theory of English philosopher John whorl about necessity of recognition of equal rights for all full citizens.Paradox of the concept of liberalism of Lock, directed against monocracy of absolute power, is that as full citizens of a potential liberal society he considered independent in relation to a monarch owners private, mainly the land property, which first of all be attributed with the ability to give intellect, that is to be rational subjects (be capable to operate own land). The central idea behind Wollstonecrafts work is that women are rational beings and should be treated as such2. According to Mary Wollstonecraft, as the theorist of the liberal concept of pistillate rights, the most important becomes the philosophical thesis about recognition of a female subject rational. Only in that case a woman has a chance to enter into a liberal continuum of full citizenship described by Lock.The other significant thesis is that female sensuality is non purely earthy, but favorablely caused characteristic. Wollstonecraft states, But, if women are to be excluded, without having a voice from a participation of the natural rights of mankind, prove first, to ward off the charge of injustice and inconsistency, that they want reason - else this flaw in your juvenile CONSTITUTION go forth ever shew that man must, in some shape, act like a tyrant, and tyranny, in whatever part of society it rears its brazen front, will ever undermine morality3.In unison with the above said theoretical issues, considering modern position of women Wollstonecraft recognizes that the majority of women are not yet officious to act in a line with men as their intellect is insufficiently developed because of preponderance of sensual characteristics in it.However this position, in her opinion, is not a cons equence of the specific nature, female sensuality as considered Russo, or particular qualities of female intellect as considered Kant. Such state of facts first of all is a result of the limited female education, and secondly of deprivations of women of basic civil rights, that is a consequence of certain social reasons which can be changed. Wollstonecrafts aim particularly in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is to add the single and civil rights of women to the universal category4. Therefore the main philosophical thesis of enlighteners, which was a subject of Wollstonecrafts critic, is Russos thesis about the special female nature, in which sensuality prevails of intellect. Wollstonecraft considers that femininity in that form as it is described by Russo, is a repressive social construct, which will cease to exist provided that socialization of women will pass in the same conditions as socialization of men. The basic object of criticism of Wollstonecraft is so-called atroph ied sensuality which is imputed to women in Russos philosophical concept. In her book the author opposes men, who are admired of excessive female sensitivity and stand up for its development. It calls such men tyrants of sexuality, and women, which agree to cultivate such eccentric person of sensuality in itself (sensuality of a sexual object) she calls slaves of pleasures. Wollstonecraft accepts that owing to sensuality women has an opportunity to use a special form of
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.