Electoral geography and how the 2010 U.S. Census impacts the political Essay

Electoral geography and how the 2010 U.S. Census impacts the political geography of a region or order - Essay ExampleAccording to Berg-Andersson (2011), there are numbers of states which won electoral votes callable to population increasewhich include Arizona (+1), Georgia (+1), Florida (+2), Nevada (+1), South Carolina (+1), Texas (+4), Utah (+1), and Washington (+1) (pp. 1). Although Al Gore won the popular vote, he did not win the electoral vote. Thusly, George Bush, Jr. was declared President of the United States due to a federal judges ruling in Florida. Bugh (2010) states, The chaos of the 2000 result made the pickle of vote counting suddenly explicit to n unrivalledxperts (pp. 118). This result was inadvertently based on population, because even though Al Gore could restrain won several votes extra than George W. BushBush could still puzzle won the electoral votes based on the fact that a large segment of the population could be accounted for having only a very few amou nt of people in a particular county. Ultimately, it was w hence upheld by the Supreme Court that, indeed, Floridas federal judge had ruled correctly. There were appeals made, but they were not successful. In any case, some states, like Arizona and Texas, continue to grow due to the influx of immigrants from Mexico. Moreover, the Latino population in this states are going to explode, as cities all over the nation are see increases in the Latino population. In Chicago alone, by 2020, it was estimated by one senior official that one out of every four citizens will be of Latino descent. According to Berg-Andersson (2011), there are as well a number of states which lost electoral votes due to population decreasewhich include Illinois (-1), Iowa (-1), Louisiana (-1), momma (-1), Michigan (-1), Missouri (-1), New Jersey (-1), New York (-2), Ohio (-2), and Pennsylvania (-1). Many people are mournful out of the Midwest due to the fact that unions are no longer going to be habituated c ollective bargaining rights. Also, according to Goudreau (2010), New York, Illinois, and Ohio (in that order) are the top three states where it is no longer economically feasible to live, and people are leaving in droves (pp. 1). Reapportionment is possible according to what happened in the 2010 census, olibanum leaving some constituents with less of a say in presidential elections. According to Bennett (2006), One proposal would have the size of the House revert to 435 after the 2010 census, but that would include one representative from the District and hence would also leave the electoral college with an odd number of members thereafter... (pp. 92). Presidential elections, obviously, should not be left to the fall of fate. It is widely-argued, and supported by most Americans, that the electoral college system is outdated and must go. According to Schmidt, Shelley, and Bardes (2009), The most obvious proposal is to eliminate the electoral college system completely (pp. 339). The re is a high possibility that Presidential elections could be determined by the population of ones state rather than the popular vote, which makes perfectly no sense. If one gets the votes, then ideally one should also win the election. After all, the electoral college may indeed vote against the will of the people for its designated area, based upon a preference for political party